リソース - アプリケーションノート
Z-Stacking and Z-Projection using a Scaffold-based 3D Cell Cultureダウンロード
Related Products: Cytation1 細胞イメージング・プレートリーダー, Cytation5 細胞イメージング・プレートリーダー
May 07, 2015
Authors: Brad Larson and Peter Banks, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT; Grant Cameron, TAP Biosystems (part of Sartorius Stedim Biotech Group), Hertfordshire, UK
Z-projection is a digital image processing method, which combines multiple images taken at different focal distances (z-stacking) to provide a composite image with a greater depth of field (i.e. the thickness of the plane of focus) than any of the individual source images1,2. It is particularly useful for capturing in-focus images of objects under high magnification as depth of field (DOF) decreases with magnification primarily because microscope objectives with higher magnification have typically higher numerical apertures (NA). According to the Shillaber equation, DOF relates to NA for a given wavelength of light (λ) and medium refractive index (n):
Table 1 illustrates this concept for a series of commercially available microscope objectives using 500 nm light and air as the medium (n = 1.00) between microscope objective and object.
Table 1. Relationship between magnification, numerical aperture and depth of field.
Note that the dimensions of a typical mammalian cell (~ 25 μm) is only within the depth of field (in focus axially) using a 4x microscope objective. Magnification of 4x is inadequate to provide sub-cellular resolution in either axial or longitudinal axes, thus localization of structures of interest within the cell through its width requires use of higher magnification and means of removing out of focus objects.
This can be done using confocal microscopy where the field of view is restricted both axially and longitudinally, much like in a pin hole camera, such that in-focus “slices” of the object can be acquired and z-stacked to form a composite 3D image of the object. However, because the excitation light illuminates the entire structure, photobleaching and phototoxic effects extend to all planes. While the lack of longitudinal restriction seen in widefield microscopy helps to eliminate these complications, parts of the object will appear in-focus and parts out-of-focus. In this case, z-stacking is still possible, but requires the use of z-projection, a technique to reduce out-of-focus information by applying a mathematical algorithm. This provides sharper images that can be combined to yield more realistic 3D impressions of the structure of interest. In this application note, we demonstrate this technique using Gen5™ Image+ Data Analysis Software to perform z-stacking and z-projection of scaffold-based 3D cellular tumoroid structure images.
Materials and Methods
Colorectal carcinoma HCT 116 cells (Catalog No. CCL-247) were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA). The cells were propagated in McCoy’s 5A Medium (Catalog No. 16600) plus Fetal Bovine Serum, 10% (Catalog No. 10437) and Pen-Strep, 1x (Catalog No. 15140) from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA). The cells were plated at a final density of 2.5x105 cells/mL for 72 hours prior to performing the assay.
Hoechst 33342 (Catalog No. 14533) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (Saint Louis, MO). Alexa Fluor® 488 phalloidin (Catalog No. A12379), and CellMask™ Orange plasma membrane stain (Catalog No. C10045) were purchased from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA).
RAFT™ Reagents and Plates
96-well RAFT Plate and 96 -well Culture Plate are part of the 4 x 96 RAFT™ Plate Kit (Catalog No. 016-0R92). Collagen Solution, 10x Minimum Essential Medium, and RAFT™ Neutralising Solution are part of the RAFT™ Reagent Kit (Catalog No. 016-0R94). All RAFT™ components were supplied by TAP Biosystems (Hertfordshire, UK), now exclusively distributed by Lonza BioScience.
Cytation 5 is a modular multi-mode microplate reader that combines automated digital microscopy and microplate detection. Cytation 5 includes filterand monochromator-based microplate reading; the microscopy module provides high resolution microscopy in fluorescence, brightfield, color brightfield and phase contrast. Cytation 5 has temperature control to 65 °C, CO2/ O2 gas control and dual injectors for kinetic assays. The instrument was used to image spheroids, as well as individual cell invasion through the Matrigel matrix.
Gen5 Image+ software controls the operation of the Cytation™ 5 for both automated digital microscopy and microplate reading. Image acquisition is completely automated from sample translation, focusing and exposure control. Users can also optimize and automate acquisition of images through 3D cellular structures or tissue, as well as creation of the final Z-Projection.
3D Cell Culture Components
RAFT™ 3D Cell Culture System
Figure 1. Creation of 3-Dimensional Cell/Collagen Hydrogel using RAFT™ System. (A) Cell/collagen mix dispensed to wells of 96-well plate. (B) 96-well RAFT™ plate containing individual sterile absorbers. (C) Absorber insertion into plate well. (D) Absorption of medium, concentrating collagen and cells to in vivo strength. (E) Completion of absorption process creating 120 μm thick hydrogel. (F) Removal of absorber prior to dispense of fresh cell medium.
The RAFT™ (Real Architecture for 3D Tissue) cell culture technique developed by TAP Biosystems, now exclusively distributed by Lonza BioScience, allows researchers to culture cell type(s) of their choice in an in vivo like collagen hydrogel environment. The technology uses the most abundant matrix protein in the body, type I collagen. The RAFT™ process raises the collagen concentration to physiological levels quickly and reproducibly. It takes less than 1 hour to generate cell cultures which are ~120μm thick, biomimetic, dimensionally stable and transparent with high cell viability.
3D Tumoroid Formation Process
HCT116 cells were added manually to the prepared collagen solution. The cell suspension was then dispensed to the 96-well plate in a volume of 240 μL per well. The final cell concentration equaled 25,000 cells/ well. The cell plate was then incubated at 37 oC/5% CO2 for 15 minutes, followed by manual addition of the absorbers in the RAFT™ plate, and an additional 15 minute incubation at 37 oC/5% CO2 during which the RAFT™ process increases the collagen density to a physiologically relevant strength. The absorbers were then removed and 100 μL of new medium was then added to the concentrated cell/collagen hydrogel. The plate was once again incubated at 37 oC/5% CO2 for three days to allow the tumoroids to form.
Following the incubation period, the spent medium was removed and the tumoroids were stained with the Hoechst 33342, Alexa Fluor® 488 phalloidin, and CellMask™ Orange plasma membrane fluorescent probes.
Creation of Z-Stacked Images
In the imaging procedure read step, selection of objective, imaging channel and exposure settings is performed in a manner similar to that for single image set capture. “Image Z-Stack” is then selected (Figure 2). The number of slices, or images taken through the structure can be manually chosen depending on the definition desired. “Step size” is the distance in μm that the objective will move in the z-axis between each captured image. The default value is the depth of field for the objective chosen, 2.5x: 68 μm; 4x: 53 μm; 10x: 9 μm; 20x: 4 μm; 40x: 2 μm; 60x: 1 μm, which can also be manually adjusted should a higher number of slices be desired.
Figure 2. Gen5 Image+ Z-Stack Read Step.
To determine the sample thickness and number of slices required to image through the complete structure, it is recommended to select manual imaging with one of the channels to be used. “Auto Focus” is selected to allow the Cytation to focus on a point within the structure. The focal height is then changed manually in each direction of the z-axis to the point where a portion of the spheroid or tissue remains in focus (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Manual Determination of Sample Thickness. Object thickness determined by finding (A.) bottom and (B.) top focal planes using manual imaging.
The total distance traveled from one point to the other is the sample thickness. This process is repeated to determine the typical focal height and distance traveled above and below the initial focal plane to reach each edge of the structure. Upon completion, manual imaging can then be closed. Using the gathered information, values are entered into the read step for “Number of slices”, “Step size”, and “Images below focus point” that equal the typical sample thickness, and also help to ensure that images are captured throughout the 3D cellular structure or tissue (Figure 2). Automated imaging can then be performed.
Following capture of the z-stacked images, z-projection can be completed by performing a “Z-Projection” Data Reduction step (Figure 4). Individual imaging channels can be chosen for inclusion in the projected image. The top and bottom image slices to use can be optimized to guarantee that the most in-focus image is created. Multiple projection methods exist which incorporate different algorithms for selecting the most in-focus portion of the z-stacked images. The method providing the desired projection may vary depending on the images captured and the final analysis required.
Figure 4. Setup of Z-Projection Analysis.
If additional imaging channels are to be included in the projection (Figure 5), subsequent channel tabs can be selected. The parameters can be kept consistent with those used for the initial channel (Figure 5A), or can also be changed if necessary (Figure 5B).
Figure 5. Subsequent Imaging Channel Z-Projection Optimization. Settings for additional imaging channels to be included in Z-Projection can be kept similar to that of (A.) Channel 1 or (B.) reoptimized.
Results and Discussion
Tumoroid Image Deconvolution and Cellular Analysis
The cells in the aggregated three dimensional tumoroid structures can be found on multiple z-planes within the RAFT™ hydrogel. Experimental analysis of the effects that a potential drug candidate has on these structures, depending on the assay and test being performed, can at times be accomplished using single plane imaging. However, this is not always the case, and a final image showing improved cellular definition may be necessary. Upon visualization of the images displayed in Figure 6, it was apparent that the z-projection of the z-stack (Figure 6D) allowed the cells to be seen with more detail and greater clarity in each tumoroid structure compared to the single plane images (Figures 6A-C).
Figure 6. Single Plane and Z-Stacked Images of HCT116 Tumoroids. Images of tumoroids captured at individual z-planes of (A.) 3446, (B.) 3470, and (C.) 3486 μm using a 20x objective. (D.) Final z-projected image of the collected z-stack.
Image overlay shown using the following channels: DAPI for identification of Hoechst 33342 stained nuclei; GFP for identification of Alexa Fluor® 488 phalloidin; Texas Red for identification of CellMask™ Orange plasma membrane stain.
Cellular analysis of 3D cellular structures can also be improved through the incorporation of a z-projected image. A clear picture of individual nuclei (Figure 7A) then allows for more precise conclusions to be drawn (Figure 7B) from the experiment being performed.
Figure 7. HCT116 tumoroid cellular analysis. (A) Z-stacked image of Hoechst 33342 stained nuclei, and (B) cell count performed using optimized analysis settings.
3D cellular models continue to be incorporated into a growing number of research areas; including dermatology and drug discovery. Here we have shown that the Cytation imagers, in conjunction with Gen5 Image Analysis Software, can provide improved depth of fields of cells aggregated into tumoroid structures within the RAFT™ hydrogel in a rapid, automated fashion, while providing accurate evaluation and conclusions from z-projected images.
- Johnson, D. How to Do Everything: Digital Camera [Online]; McGraw Hill Professional: New York, 2008; 336. http://books.google.com/books?id=h15xmx3m a2cC&q=inauthor:%22Dave+Johnson%22&dq=inaut hor:%22Dave+Johnson%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ihdcU sj_HM_okAeuloHQBA&ved=0CGkQ6AEwCA (accessed October 14, 2013).
- Ray, S. F. Applied Photographic Optics, 3rd Edition; Focal Press: Oxford, 2002, 231-232.
Alexa Fluor® is a registered trademark of Molecular Probes Inc.